Back to Work OpenMetadata Website
Overview Problem Process Design Impact

OpenMetadata Website · Process

The full process

The research, personas and flows behind OpenMetadata Website. The case study covers the decisions; this is the work underneath them.

02 — User Research

User Persona & Goals

Three distinct visitor types arrive at open-metadata.org with entirely different jobs-to-be-done. Each persona shaped the information architecture and content hierarchy of the redesigned site.

👤
Deepak Rao
Data Engineering Team Lead, 33
Goals
  • Evaluate OpenMetadata for team adoption
  • Understand integration depth with existing stack
  • Find documentation and quickstart guides quickly
Pain Points
  • Feature-focused homepage ignores use-case clarity
  • No comparison with paid alternatives like Collibra
🧑
Aarav Mehta
Open Source Contributor, 26
Goals
  • Find contribution guides and project architecture docs
  • Understand roadmap and community governance
  • Connect with other contributors and join community Slack
Pain Points
  • GitHub and Slack links buried below the fold
  • No clear community entry points on the homepage
👩
Sunita Iyer
Data Infrastructure Architect, 41
Goals
  • Benchmark OpenMetadata against Alation and Collibra
  • Understand self-hosted vs managed deployment options
  • Get indicative pricing before engaging sales
Pain Points
  • No self-hosted vs managed comparison on the site
  • Vague "enterprise" section without concrete specifics

03 — Business Challenges

Core Challenges

CHALLENGE 01
📄
Feature-First Copywriting

The site led with what OpenMetadata was — not what it did for you. "Metadata ingestion for 120+ connectors" communicates nothing to a data leader. Every section needed an outcome-first inversion.

CHALLENGE 02
🔗
Poor Conversion Path

Technical visitors had no clear path from interest to action. The journey from homepage to community join, sandbox trial, or docs was buried under competing calls-to-action at the same visual weight.

CHALLENGE 03
🏗️
Visual Hierarchy Failure

Integration logos, code snippets, feature cards, and marketing copy all competed at identical visual weight. Proof points — case studies, integrations, and community size — were not surfaced where visitors needed them.

CHALLENGE 04
⚖️
No Differentiation from Paid Alternatives

Enterprise visitors evaluating governance solutions needed a clear answer to "why OpenMetadata over Alation or Collibra?" The site made no attempt to answer this, losing high-intent enterprise visitors silently.


04 — Secondary Research

Market Insights

FINDING 01
42%
Bounce Before First Scroll

42% of homepage visitors were bouncing before scrolling past the hero — indicating the above-the-fold value proposition was failing to create immediate relevance for any of the three visitor types.

FINDING 02
73%
Multi-Page Technical Buyers

73% of technical buyers visit 5 or more pages before initiating contact with an open-source project. A site with poor internal linking and no guided journey was failing to retain this high-intent segment across their research cycle.

FINDING 03
Top Exit
Integrations as Drop-Off Point

The integrations page was the top exit point — visitors arrived expecting a searchable, filterable catalog and found a flat list. Redesigning integrations as a trust-signal catalog became a primary design priority.


07 — User Flow

The Journey

STEP 01
Land on Homepage
Visitor arrives via search, referral, or GitHub. Hero immediately frames OpenMetadata around their outcome, not the product's feature list.
STEP 02
Understand the Product
The hero section leads with "your data team deserves to know their data" — anchoring value before revealing mechanism. Each persona finds their natural entry point.
STEP 03
Explore Features
Outcome-led feature sections guide visitors through discovery, lineage, governance, and quality — with persona-specific depth cues for developers and enterprise buyers.
STEP 04
Check Integrations
Searchable, filterable integration catalog with 120+ connectors spanning databases, cloud storage, pipelines, dashboards, and ML platforms — redesigned from a raw list into a trust signal that communicates breadth and community contribution.
STEP 05
Contact / Join Community
Clear forked CTAs route developers to sandbox trial and contributors to community Slack, while enterprise visitors reach a guided demo request path.

08 — Toolkits

Tools & Workflow

Tools and methods used throughout the OpenMetadata website design process — from discovery and analytics to design and delivery.

🎨FigmaUI Design
🗺️FigJamIA & Journey Mapping
🔥HotjarHeatmaps & Recordings
📊Google AnalyticsTraffic & Funnel Data
📝NotionResearch & Documentation

Design Process

From audit to launch

A five-phase process anchored in audience research and conversion thinking — treating the website as a product with measurable outcomes, not a brochure to be designed and forgotten.

01
Audit
Analytics review, heatmaps, session recordings, and community survey to map existing pain points.
02
Persona Mapping
Defined three distinct visitor personas — OSS Developer, Data Engineer, and Enterprise Buyer — each with unique jobs-to-be-done.
03
Content Architecture
Restructured the site IA around outcomes: What problem do you have? → How OpenMetadata solves it → Proof → Next step.
04
Visual Design
Built a technical-but-approachable visual language: deep dark backgrounds, data-viz-inspired accents, and clean typography that signals reliability.
05
Launch & Iterate
Shipped with analytics instrumented from day one. Iterated homepage hero copy 3 times based on A/B results within 60 days of launch.

Back Return to the case study